فصلنامه علمی مطالعات راهبردی فرهنگ

فصلنامه علمی مطالعات راهبردی فرهنگ

واکاوی ریشه‌های شکست سیاست‌های حجاب با استفاده از نظریه داده‌بنیاد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
ناهید سلیمی
استادیار گروه مطالعات اجتماعی، پژوهشکدۀ زن و خانواده، تهران، ایران
10.22083/scsj.2025.472728.1200
چکیده
در دو دهه اخیر سیاست‌گذاری عمومی در موضوع حجاب و عفاف با مناقشات پیچیده‌ای روبرو شده است. هرچند دولت‌ها در طول سال‌های بعد از انقلاب، تلاش کرده‌اند با سیاست‌گذاری و قانون‌گذاری، چالش‌های این موضوع را به حداقل برسانند با این حال، اکثر این ابتکارات سیاستی، نتوانسته‌اند به اهداف مورد نظر خود دست یابند. اهدافی که طی چند دهه مداوماً تعیین شده‌اند، هنوز در آینده نزدیک نیز دست نیافتنی به نظر می‌رسند. به همین روی، در قدم اول، نیازمند آسیب‌شناسی فرآیند سیاست‌گذاری حجاب در ایران هستیم. به منظور شناسایی حوزه‌های کلیدی منجر به شکست سیاست‌های حجاب؛ مصاحبه عمیق با 15 نفر از خبرگان و 4 جلسه فوکوس گروپ با 20 نفر از اندیشمندان در حوزه زنان مبتنی بر رویکرد نظریه داده‌بنیاد به عنوان یک روش کیفی در تحقیق با رویکرد اکتشافی انجام شده است. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی استفاده شد. در این روند پس از تحلیل و دسته‌بندی مفاهیم و مقوله‌های فرعی حاصل از کدگذاری باز، به مقوله‌های اصلی در قالب پدیده ‌محوری، شرایط علی، زمینه‌ای، مداخله‌ای، کنش‌ها و مکانیزم‌ها و پیامدها دست یافتیم که در نهایت با گزاره‌های نظری و حکمی در کدگذاری انتخابی تشریح و تفسیر شدند. بنابراین، پدیده محوری "ناکامی چندوجهی سیاست‌های حجاب و عفاف" در ایران با مدل پارادایمی در ارتباط با شرایط احصا شده، بازنمایی شد و راه‌کارهایی را برای برون‌رفت از شرایط موجود دریافت کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سیاست‌گذاری عمومی
حجاب
شکست سیاست
فرآیند سیاست‌گذاری

عنوان مقاله English

Analyzing the reasons for the failure of hijab policies using the grounded theory method

نویسنده English

Nahid salimi
Assistant professor, Department of Social Science Group, Women and Family Research Institute,Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introducion: In recent decades, the governance of hijab and chastity policies in the Islamic Republic of Iran has become one of the most contentious cultural and social issues. Although post-revolution governments have consistently attempted to institutionalize hijab through policy formulation and legislation, the persistent inability to reach desired outcomes highlights a significant policy gap. More than four decades after the revolution, official monitoring data indicate that approximately 60% to 70% of Iranian women fall within the spectrum of “non-standard hijab,” with up to 15% considered openly disobedient. These statistics reveal a vast “gray area” of public adherence, underscoring the limitations of prevailing strategies.
Methods: The research at hand aims to provide a comprehensive diagnosis of why hijab policies in Iran have systematically failed to achieve their goals. It employs grounded theory methodology, specifically the Strauss and Corbin systematic approach, to derive an interpretative model of policy failure rooted in empirical data. Through in-depth interviews with 15 policy experts and four focus group sessions with 20 scholars, the study gathered qualitative data that were then subjected to open, axial, and selective coding.
Results: The central phenomenon identified through this methodology is the “Multifaceted failure of hijab and chastity policies” This central concept reflects a confluence of political, cultural, structural, and discursive breakdowns. The study categorizes causal conditions (such as increasing societal resistance and critique of mandatory hijab), contextual conditions (such as cultural transformations and competing gender ideologies), and intervening conditions (including governance fragmentation and misaligned bureaucratic execution). These conditions are linked to strategic responses—or lack thereof—taken by the policy apparatus.
Among the critical findings are three dysfunctional strategies: (1) Securitization and Intensified Control, which transformed a cultural issue into a policing agenda; (2) denial and avoidance of policy learning, wherein authorities ignore academic research and societal feedback; and (3) Interim and Symbolic Reactions, characterized by superficial campaigns and public messaging rather than systemic change. These strategies, while aimed at controlling dissent or reasserting authority, have largely backfired, resulting in reduced public trust, increased social polarization, and ultimately the reproduction of failed policies.
The consequences of these strategies are explored in depth. The research highlights the production of “bad policies”—those that are reactive, overly centralized, and disconnected from ground-level realities. This is coupled with the absence of necessary policies, such as educational, cultural, and family-oriented initiatives that might foster voluntary alignment with Islamic values. The model developed in this study maps these failures across the policy cycle—from agenda-setting to evaluation—demonstrating that failures occur not only at the point of implementation but also in design, legitimacy, and responsiveness.
This study contributes to the broader literature on policy failure and learning by contextualizing Iran’s hijab policies within a systemic framework. It proposes that hijab, as a policy issue, cannot be addressed effectively through coercion or top-down mandates alone. Instead, policies must engage with the cultural, discursive, and generational transformations within Iranian society. Furthermore, the study underscores the importance of bridging the gap between knowledge and policy, advocating for a greater incorporation of empirical research and public engagement into the policy process.
Discussion: Therefore, the central phenomenon of " Multifaceted failure of hijab and chastity policies" in Iran was represented with a paradigmatic model in relation to the listed conditions, and it received solutions to overcome the existing conditions. In conclusion, the research underscores the multi-dimensional nature of policy failure in the case of Iran’s hijab regulation. The complexity of the issue demands an equally nuanced and layered approach to policy design—one that respects cultural dynamics, prioritizes social trust, and leverages evidence-based policymaking. The grounded theory model offered in this paper not only unpacks the specific factors behind policy inefficacy in the domain of hijab but also serves as a broader template for analyzing policy failure in similarly complex socio-political contexts.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Public policy
hijab
policy failure
policy making process
منابع و مأخذ
آشنا، حسام الدین و حسین مهربانی‌فر (1392). تحلیل سیاست گذاری قانون ساماندهی مد و لباس مجلس شورای اسلامی بر اساس مدل فرایندی، دین و ارتباطات، 20(1)، 5-42. DOI: 10.30497/rc.2013.1501
امامی سیدمجتبی، باقری کنی مصباح‌ الهدی و سجاد لطفی (1395). گونه شناسی ذهنیت های خط مشی گذاران و مجریان درباره مدیریت مواجهه با بدحجابی در ایران؛ پژوهشی مبتنی بر روش شناسی کیو، راهبرد فرهنگ، 9(33)، 7-39.
بازرگان هرندی، عاس (1389). مقدمه‌ای بر روش‌های تحقیق کیفی و آمیخته، تهران: نشر دیدار.
باقری میاب، شهلا و محمدرضا باقری (1391). الزامات همسویی نهادهای سیاست گذار و اجرایی در فرایند خط مشی گذاری فرهنگی عفاف و حجاب. تحقیقات فرهنگی ایران، 5(3)، 31-45. DOI: 10.7508/ijcr.2012.19.002
برگر، پیتر،‌توماس لاکمن (1394)، س‍اخ‍ت اج‍ت‍م‍اع‍ی واق‍ع‍ی‍ت (رس‍ال‍ه‌ای در ج‍ام‍ع‍ه‌شن‍اس‍ی ش‍ن‍اخ‍ت)، ت‍رج‍مۀ‌فریبرز مجیدی، ت‍ه‍ران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
دانایی‌فرد، حسن (1400). آنچه کیفیت حکمرانی ملی کشور را تهدید می کند: خط مشی های بد، نبود خط مشی‌های لازم، خط مشی‌های تأخیری. مطالعات مدیریت دولتی ایران، 4(2)، 0-0. DOI: 10.22034/JIPAS.2021.145742
دانایی‌فرد، حسن، الوانی، سیدمهدی و آذر عادل (1390). روش پژوهش کمی در مدیریت: رویکرید جامع. ناشر: اشراقی.
دانایی‌فرد، حسن و سیدمجتبی امامی (1386). «استراتژی‌های پژوهش کیفی: تأملی بر نظریه‌پردازی داده بنیاد». اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی (اندیشه مدیریت)، 1(2)، 69-97.
حسینی، سید عباس (1396). ظرفیت‌ها و دلالت‌های نظریه فرهنگی برگر در عرصه سیاستگذاری فرهنگی،‌سیاست نامه علم و فناوری، 7 (2). 45-54.
پل ساباتیه (1396). نظریه‌های فرایند خط مشی عمومی، ترجمۀ حسن دانایی‌فرد، تهران، صفار.
شهسواری گوغری، احسان، ضیاء‌الدینی، محمد، هادوی نژاد، مصطفی و حمید تابلی (1400). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل شکست اجرای خط‌مشی‌های بهداشت و ایمنی بر اساس تکنیک واکاوی حالات نقص و اثرات آن و با بکارگیری روش AHP و TOPSIS فازی (مورد مطالعه: صنایع و معادن استان کرمان). خطمشی‌گذاری عمومی در مدیریت. 12(3). 47-63.
طباطبائی، سیدمحمدحسین (1374)،‌بدایة الحکمة، ص 85، قم، مؤسسه نشر اسلامی.
عزیزی، شهریار (1395). روش پژوهش در مدیریت با تأکید بر مثالهای کاربردی و آماری. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
عیسی وند، لیلا و محمد توحیدفام (1394). بررسی علل شکست سیاست هدفمندسازی یارانه ها در ایران. تحقیقات حقوق خصوصی و کیفری (دانشنامه حقوق و سیاست)، 11(23)، 11-38. DOR: 20.1001.1.22285952.1394.11.23.2.4
فلاح تفتی، فاطمه (1393). مسئولیت حکومت اسلامی در امر حجاب با استناد به ادله ی امر به معروف و نهی از منکر.‌مطالعات راهبردی زنان، ۱۶ (۶۴)، ۷۳-۱۱۵.
قربانیان، محمد، لیاقت، عبدالمجید و مرضیه مالمیر (1399). بررسی علل شکست سیاست‌های مدیریت مشارکتی آب در ایران.‌سیاستگذاری عمومی ۶ (۳)، ۱۶۹-۱۹۰. DOI: 10.22059/jppolicy.2021.79496
کلهر، سینا و رضا مردیها (1396)، مدیریت حجاب در جمهوری اسلامی: بازخوانی سیاست های و اقدامات جمهوری اسلامی درباره حجاب، نشر: آرما، تهران
محمدی جورکویه، علی (1401). موضع سیاست جنایی اسلام در مسئله حجاب.‌مطالعات فقهی‌ حقوقی زن و خانواده. 5 (10). 111-134. DOR: 20.1001.1.25885588.1401.5.10.6.3
محمدیان، مهدی و جواد خدادادبرمی (1399). آسیب‌شناسی شکست سیاست‌های عمومی با تأکید بر سیاست‌های اقتصادی در ایران. فصلنامه سیاستگذاری عمومی، 1(6)، 87-110.
مرادخانی، همایون (1396). اراده به اداره کردن: حجاب و ابژه های آن پس از انقلاب اسلامی. مجله جامعه شناسی ایران، 17(1-2)، 167-191. DOR: 20.1001.1.17354379.1396.17.1.9.5
مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس (1397)، گزارش عوامل مؤثر بر اجرایی شدن سیاستهای حجاب و راهکارهای پیشرو، معاونت پژوهش‌های اجتماعی- فرهنگی، دفتر مطالعات فرهنگی، شماره مسلسل 15958.
منتظرقائم، مهدی و محمدحسن یادگاری (1394). مطالعه بازنمایی حجاب، پوشش و آرایش هنرپیشگان زن در پوسترهای فیلم های سینمای ایران و مطابقت آن با سیاست گذاری فرهنگی سه دولت (سازندگی، اصلاحات و اصولگرا): به روش رهیافت گفتمانی استوارت هال. دین و ارتباطات، 22(2)، 157-193. DOI: 20.1001.1.20085702.1394.22.2.8.3
میرعمادی، طاهره و زهره رحیمی‌راد (1398). واکاوی عوامل زمینه‌ای شکست سیاست‌های علم، فناوری و نوآوری. سیاست علم و فناوری، 11(2). 599-617. DOR: 20.1001.1.20085702.1398.11.2.12.3
نامداریان، لیلا (1395). مروری بر نقش آزمایشگاه ها در سیاستگذاری علم، فناوری و نوآوری. کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت و اقتصاد در قرن 21. DOR: 20.1001.1.26456336.1395.12.3.9.5
هاشمی، سیدحسین (1386). نقدی بر ماده 638 ق.م.ا. در جرم انگاری بد حجابی. مطالعات راهبردی زنان (کتاب زنان)، 10(37)(فقه و حقوق)، 133-160. DOR: 20.1001.1.20085702.1386.10.37.7.2
Abdulsami, I. (1987). The Concept and Process of Public Policy. A paper presented at the national workshop for chief nursing officers, in Zaria.
Anderson, J. E. (2011), Public Policymaking: An Introduction, Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Allcock,‌C.,‌F.‌Dorman,‌R.‌Taunt, and‌J.‌Dixon.‌(2015). Constructive Comfort: Accelerating Change in the NHS.‌London:‌Health Foundation.
Argyrous, G. (2009). Evidence for Policy and Decision-Making. Sydney: UNSW Press.
ASHENA, H., & MEHRABANIFAR, HUSSEIN. (2013). A POLICY ANALYSIS OF MAJLIS’S LAW ON ORGANIZING FASHION AND COSTUME, BASED ON PROCESS MODEL. RELIGION & COMMUNICATION, 20(1 (43) ), 5-42. DOI: 10.30497/rc.2013.1501 [In Persian]
BAGHERI, SHAHLA, & BAGHERI, MOHAMMAD REZA. (2012). CULTURAL REQUIREMENTS OF POLICY MAKING SYSTEM FOR HIJAB AND DIGNITY. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CULTURAL RESEARCH, 5(3 (19)), 31-45. DOI: 10.7508/ijcr.2012.19.002 [In Persian]
Banks, Gary.‌(2009).‌Evidence-Based Policy-Making: What Is It? How Do We Get It?‌Canberra, Australia: Productivity Commission. DOI: 10.22459/CRAPP.05.2009.10
Bazargan Harandi, Abbas. (2010). An introduction to qualitative and mixed methods research approaches common in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Didar [In Persian]
Bekker, brithny. (2012). The Grounded Theory Method and its uses for political science. Free University of Berlin ,Lecturer at John F. Kennedy Institute (JFK):Result of the seminar on Methods of Field Research (WS 15272) in the fall semester 2011/12.
Birks M, Mills J, Francis K, et al. (2009).‌A thousand words paint a picture: the use of storyline in grounded theory research.‌J Res Nurs.‌14: 405–417. [Google Scholar]. DOI: 10.1177/1744987109104675
Birks M, Mills J.‌(2015). Grounded theory: a practical guide. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
Bogenschneider, Karen, and‌Thomas J. Corbett.‌(2010).‌Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights from Policy-Minded Researchers and Research-Minded Policymakers.‌New York: Routledge.
Bovens, M., & 't Hart, P. (1996). Understanding policy fiascoes. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Braithwaite,‌J.,‌K.‌Churruca,‌J. C.‌Long,‌L. A.‌Ellis, and‌J.‌Herkes.‌(2018). “When Complexity Science Meets Implementation Science: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Systems Change.” BMC Medicine 16 (63). DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1057-z
Brewer, Garry, and Deleon, Peter. (1983).The foundations of Policy Analysis, Homewood, IL: Dorsey press.
Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cherney, Adrian.‌(2013).‌Academic–Industry Collaborations and Knowledge Co-Production in the Social Sciences.‌Journal of Sociology. Published electronically on July 8.
Cherney, Adrian,‌Brian W. Head,‌Jenny Povey,‌Paul Boreham, and‌Michele Ferguson.‌(2013).‌The Utilisation of Social Science Research—The Perspectives of Academic Researchers in Australia.‌Journal of Sociology‌51(2):‌252–‌70.
Cherney, Adrian,‌Brian W. Head,‌Paul Boreham,‌Jenny Povey, and‌Michele Ferguson.‌(2012).‌Perspectives of Academic Social Scientists on Knowledge Transfer and Research Collaborations: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Australian Academics.‌Evidence and Policy‌8(4):‌433–‌53.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage, 3rd.
Corbin, J., Strauss, A. & Strauss, A. L. (2014). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, Canada: Sage Press.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed).Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Conlon, C. (2020). 11 Sampling and conceptualisation in grounded theory. Qualitative Analysis: Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed). California: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry, Theory into Practice, 39 (3): 124-130
Danaeifard, Hassan. (2021). What threatens the quality of national governance in the country: bad policies, lack of necessary policies, delayed policies. Iranian Public Administration Studies , 4 (2), .DOI: 10.22034/JIPAS.2021.145742 [In Persian]
Danaeifard, Hassan, and Emami, Seyed Mojtabi. (2007). Qualitative Research Strategies - Grounded Data Theorizing. Strategic Management Thought (Management Thought), 1(2), 0-0. [In Persian]
DeLeon, P. (1999). The stages approach to the policy process: What has it done? Where is it going? In P.A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 19–32). Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Dryzek, J.S. (2006). Policy analysis as critique. In: Moran M, Rein M and Goodin RE (eds The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 190–203.DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.001.0001
Dunn, W.N. (2017). Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach (6th ed.). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315181226
Easton D. (1998). The analysis of political structure, New York–London: Routledge.
Fallah Tafti, Fatemeh. (2014). The responsibility of the Islamic government in the matter of hijab based on the evidence of enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong.‌Strategic Studies of Women‌,‌16‌(64), 73-115. [In Persian]
Frey, B.S. (2017). Reactivity in Economic Science. CESifo Working Papers, No.6593.
Frey, B.S. (2017). Reactivity in Economic Science. CESifo Working Papers, No.6593.
Ghorbanian, Mohammad, Liaqat, Abdul Majid and Malmir, Marzieh. (2019). Investigating the causes of failure of participatory water management policies in Iran.‌Public Policy‌,‌6‌(3), 169-190. doi: DOI: 10.22059/jppolicy.2021.79496. [In Persian]
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valey, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss (1967): The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Glaser BG. (1978).‌Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Goyal, Nihit.‌2021. “Explaining Policy Success Using the Multiple Streams Framework: Political Success Despite Programmatic Failure of the Solar Energy Policy in Gujarat, India.”‌Policy Studies Journal. Accessed on April 22, 2021. Available online at‌https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12415
Goertz, Gary and James Mahoney (2012): A Tale of Two Cultures. Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton, Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
Goodhart, C. (1981). Problems of monetary management: the U.K. experience. In: Courakis, A.S. (Ed.), Inflation, Depression, and Economic Policy in the West. Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 111–146.
Gunn,‌L. A.‌(1978).‌“Why is Implantation so Difficult?”‌Management Services in Government 33:‌169–176.‌
Gupta, DK. (2001). Analyzing Public Policy: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
HASHEMI, SEYED HOSSEIN. (2007). A CRITIQUE ON CONSIDERING UNACCEPTABLE FORMS OF HIJAB AS A CRIME BY ARTICLE 638 OF IRANIAN PENAL LAW. WOMEN'S STRATEGIC STUDIES (KETABE ZANAN), 10(37), 133-160. DOR: 20.1001.1.20085702.1386.10.37.7.2 [In Persian]
Danaeifard Hassan, Mehdi Alvani, Adel Azar (2009). Quantitative Research Methodology in Management: A Comprehensive Approach . Tehran: Saffar: Ishraqi. [In Persian]
Haynes, Abby S.,‌James A. Gillespie,‌Gemma E. Derrick,‌Wayne D. Hall,‌Sally Redman,‌Simon Chapman, and‌Heidi Sturk.‌(2011).‌Galvanizers, Guides, Champions, and Shields: The Many Ways that Policymakers Use Public Health Researchers.‌Milbank Quarterly‌89(4):‌564–‌98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00639.x
Hirschman, A.O.‌ (1967). The Principle of the Hiding Hand Brookings Institution.
Hosseini, Seyed Abbas. (2017). The potential and implications of Berger's cultural theory in the field of cultural policy-making.‌Science and Technology Policy Journal‌,‌07‌(2), 45-54. [In Persian]
Hood, C. (2007), ‘Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: Reflections on the tools of government after two decades’, Governance 20: 127–144. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00370.x
Howlett, M. (2012). The lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy
Howlett, M. (2020). Dealing with the dark side of policy-making: Managing behavioural risk and volatility in policy designs. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice, 22(6), 612–625. DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2020.1785545
Hudson,‌B.‌1993.‌“Michael Lipsky and Street-Level Bureaucracy: A Neglected Perspective.”‌In The Policy Process: A Reader, edited by‌M‌Hill‌.‌Hertfordshire:‌Harvester Wheatsheaf
Hudson, Bob. Hunter, David & Peckham, Stephen.‌(2019).‌Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help?,‌Policy Design and Practice,‌2:1,‌1-14,‌DOI:‌10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378.
Imami, Seyed Mojtaba, Baqeri Kani, Mesbah UlHuda, & Lotfi, Sajjad. (2016). Typology of Mindset of Policymakers and Executives Regarding Dealing with Lack of Proper Observance of Hijab in Iran: A Study Based on Q Methodology. STRATEGY FOR CULTURE, 9(33 ), 7-39. [In Persian]
Ingram, H.M., & Mann, D.E. (1980). Why policies succeed or fail. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
ISAVAND, LEILA, & TOHIDFAM, MOHAMMAD. (2015). INVESTIGATING THE CAUSES OF THE FAILURE OF THE POLICY OF SUBSIDIES IN IRAN. JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLITICS, 11(23), 11-38. DOR: 20.1001.1.22285952.1394.11.23.2.4 [In Persian]
Parrish, Julia K. and Leah Edelstein-Keshet. (1999). Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. Science, 284:99–101. DOI: 10.1126/science.284.5411.99
Kalhor Sina. Mardiha Reza. (2016).Hijab Management in the Islamic Republic: A Review of the Policies and Actions of the Islamic Republic of Iran Regarding "Non-Hijab and Improper Hijab" .
Isfahan: Arma. [In Persian]
Kendall, J. (1999). Axial Coding and the Grounded Theory Controversy. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(6): 743-757. DOI: 10.1177/019394599902100602
Kerr, D. H. (1976). The logic of policy? and successful policies. Policy Sciences, 7(3), 351–363. DOI: 10.1007/BF00145739
Kilonzo, Susan & Ojebode, Ayobami. (2022). Research Methods for Public Policy.. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-99724-3_4
Lasswell, H.D. (1971). A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York, NY: American Elsevier.
Leong, C., & Howlett, M. (2022). Policy Learning, Policy Failure, and the Mitigation of Policy Risks: Re-Thinking the Lessons of Policy Success and Failure.‌Administration & Society,‌54(7), 1379–1401. DOI: 10.1177/00953997211062165
Lipsky,‌M.‌(1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy.‌New York:‌Russell Sage Foundation.‌
Ljungqvist, L. (2008). Lucas critique. In: Durlauf, S.N., Blume, L.E. (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Majles Research Center, (2018), Report on Factors Affecting the Implementation of Hijab Policies and Progressive Strategies, Deputy for Socio-Cultural Research, Office of Cultural Studies, Serial Number 15958. [In Persian]
Marton, F. (2000). The structure of awareness. In J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography. 102-116. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University.
Marton,‌F.‌and‌Booth,‌S.‌(1997).‌Learning and Awareness.‌Mahwah, N.J.:‌Lawrence Erlbaum.
Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.
McConnell, A. (2010a). Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 345–362.
McConnell, A. (2010b). Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan
Mcconnell, Allan. (2015). What is policy failure? A primer to help navigate the maze. Public Policy and Administration. 30. 10.1177/0952076714565416.
McConnell,‌A.‌(2015). “What Is Policy Failure? A Primer to Help Navigate the Maze” Public Policy and Administration 30 (3–4):‌221–242.‌[Crossref],‌[Web of Science ®],‌[Google Scholar]
McConnell, A. (2010a). Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 345–362. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X10000152
McConnell, A. (2015). What Is policy failure? A primer to help navigate the maze. Public Policy and Administration, 30, 221–242. DOI: 10.1177/0952076714565416
Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1(6), 894–904.
Mir-Emadi, Tahereh and Rahimi-Rad, Zohreh. (2019). Analyzing the underlying factors of the failure of science, technology and innovation policies.‌Science and Technology Policy‌,‌12‌(2), 599-617. DOR: 20.1001.1.20085702.1398.11.2.12.3 [In Persian]
Mohammadi Jorkuyeh, Ali. (1401). The position of Islamic criminal policy on the issue of hijab.‌Jurisprudential Studies on Women and Family Law‌,‌5‌(10), 111-134. [In Persian]
Montazerghaem, Mehdi, Yadegari, Mohammad Hassan. (2015). 'A Study of the Representation of Hijab, Clothing and Makeup of Female Actresses in Iranian Cinema Posters and Its Compliance with the Cultural Policies of Three Governments (Constructionist, Reformist and Fundamentalist): Using Stuart Hall's Discourse Approach',‌Religion and Communication (Imam Sadeq University/Nameh Sadeq)‌, 22(2), pp. 157-193. doi: 10.30497/rc.2016.1818. DOI: 20.1001.1.20085702.1394.22.2.8.3  [In Persian]
Moradkhani, Homayoun, (2016), The Will to Rule: The Hijab and Its Objects after the Islamic Revolution,‌the Iranian Journal of Sociology,17 (1-2),  167-191. DOR: 20.1001.1.17354379.1396.17.1.9.5 [In Persian]
Mueller, Bernardo. (2020). Why public policies fail: Policymaking under complexity. EconomiA. 21. 311-323. 10.1016/j.econ.2019.11.002. DOI: 10.1016/j.econ.2019.11.002
Myers N. (2016). Policy Making to Build Relationships: A Grounded Theory Analysis of Interviews and Documents Relating to H1N1, Ebola, and the U.S. Public Health Preparedness Network. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 39 (3):313-56. PMID: 29389094.
Namdarian, Leila. (2016). A review of the role of laboratories in science, technology and innovation policy-making. International Conference on Management and Economics in the 21st Century. DOR: 20.1001.1.26456336.1395.12.3.9.5 [In Persian]
Newman, J., Cherney, A. and Head, B.W. (2016). Do Policy Makers Use Academic Research? Reexamining the “Two Communities” Theory of Research Utilization. Public Admin Rev, 76: 24-32. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12425
Newman, Joshua, Andrian Cherney, and Brian W.‌Head. (2015). Do Policy Makers Use Academic Research Reexamining the Two Communities Theory of Research Utilisation. Public Administration Review 76 (1): 24–32.
Norse, D. and Tschirley, J.B. (2000). Links between Science and Policy Making. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 82:15–26.
Norris,‌E., and‌J.‌McCrae.‌(2013). Policy that Sticks: Preparing to govern for lasting change.‌London:‌Institute for Government.
Nutley, Sandra,‌Isabel Walter, and‌Huw T.O. Davies.‌(2007).‌Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services.‌Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Parish, J. T., & Edelstein, M. R. (1999). Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary tradeoffs in public policy systems. Complexity, 5(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199909/10)5:1<46::AID-CPLX8>3.0.CO;2-Z
Pattyn, Valérie & Brans, Marleen. (2015). Organisational analytical capacity: Policy evaluation in Belgium. Policy and Society.. DOI: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.009
Peters, B.G. (2015). State failure, governance failure and policy failure: Exploring the linkages.‌Public Policy and Administration,‌30(3-4), pp.261-276. DOI: 10.1177/0952076715598822
Pierce, Roger (2008): Research Methods in Politics. A Practical Guide. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; Or, why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the economic development administration as told by two sympathetic observers. University of California Pres
Punch , Keith. (2004).Introduction to Social Research : Qualitative and Quatitative  Approache London: Sage Publications.
Quevauviller, P., Balabanis, P., Fragakis, C., Weydert, M., Oliver, M., Kaschl, A., Arnold, G., Kroll, A., Galbiati, L., Zaldivar, J.M., Bidoglio, G. (2005). Science-Policy Integration Needs in Support of the Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Environ Sci Policy 8:203–211.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
Sabatier, Paul A., - m. (2014). Theories of the Public Policy Process/Written by [Correct: Editor] Paul E. Sabatier; Translated by Hassan Danaeifard. Tehran: Saffar. [In Persian]
Salamon, L. M Stefan Toepler (2015). Government-Nonprofit Cooperation: Anomaly or Necessity?Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit OrganizationsVol. 26, No. 6, Unlikely Partners? Evolving Government-Nonprofit Relationships, East and West (December 2015), pp. 2155-2177‌
Shahsavari Goqeri, Ehsan, Ziaaddini, Mohamad, HADAVINEJAD, MOSTAFA, & Taboil, Hamid. (2021). Identifying and Prioritizing the Causes of Failure of Health and Safety Policies Based on the Technique of Investigating Defects and its Effects and Using AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods (Case Study: Industries and Mines of Kerman Province). IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY IN MANAGEMENT, 12(43 ), 47-63. [In Persian]
Shahriar Azizi. (1016).Research Methodology in Management with Emphasis on Applied and Statistical Examples. Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Textbooks at Universities (SAMAT), Humanities Research and Development Center. [In Persian]
Schneider, AL. and Ingram, H. (1997). Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Stone, D. (2012). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, 3rd. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Strauss, A. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N.K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Strauss AL, Corbin JM. (1990).‌The basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Taylor, D. and Balloch, S. (eds) (2005). The Politics of Evaluation: Participation and Policy Implementation. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Timonen, V. Foley, G. & Conlon, C. (2018). Challenges when using grounded theory: A pragmatic introduction to doing GT research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1),. DOI: 10.1177/1609406918758086
Thomas, George (2005): “The Qualitative Foundations of Political Science Methodology”, in: Perspectives on Politics, 3(4), pp. 855-866. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592705050471
Thomas Luckmann‌,‌Peter. Berger .(2016).  - The Social Construction of Reality (A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge). Translator:Fariborz Majidi. Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company. 3rd edition (Islamic Revolution Education. [In Persian]
Tiernan‌,‌J.‌Wanna‌.‌(2006). Competence, capacity, capability: Towards conceptual clarity in the discourse of declining policy skills. Presented at the govnet international conference.‌Australian National University (ANU), Canberra
Tierney, W. G., & Clemens, R. F. (2011). Qualitative research and public policy: The challenges of relevance and trustworthiness. In C. Conrad & R. C. Serlin (Eds.), The Sage Handbook for Research in Education: Pursuing Ideas as the Keystone of Exemplary Inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 57–77). SAGE Publications.
Vedung, E. (2013). Six models of evaluation. In: Araral A, Fritzen S, Howlett M, et al. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 387–400.
Volker,‌P.‌(2014).‌“Vision Without Execution is Hallucination”,‌Public Administration Review 74 (4):‌439–441.‌[Crossref],‌[Web of Science ®],‌[Google Scholar]
Waller . M.‌. (1992).‌Evaluating policy advice. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 51(4):‌440–449.‌‌[Google Scholar]
Waller D, Kang M, Gibson S, Brooks F, Medlow S, Steinbeck K, Perry L. Development and implementation of Australian State, territory, and national policy on the health and wellbeing of adolescents and young adults: An exploration of policy actor perspectives using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2024 Feb;48(1):100112. doi: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100112. Epub 2024 Jan 9. PMID: 38198902
Wallis, SE. (2011). Avoiding Policy Failure: A Workable Approach. Litchfield Park, AZ: Emergent Publications.
Weaver,‌K.‌(2010). “But Will It Work?” Issues in Government Studies 32:‌1–17.‌
Woodside, K. (1986). Policy Instruments and the Study of Public Policy.‌Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique,‌19(4), 775–793. DOI: 10.1017/S0008423900055152
Wu, X., Ramesh, M. and Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities.‌Policy and Society,‌34(3-4), pp.165-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001
Wuelser, Gabriela, Pohl, Christian and Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude (2011). Structuring Complexity for Tailoring Research Contributions to Sustainable Development: A Framework. Sustainability Science, 7:81-93. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-011-0140-1
X.M.‌Wu‌,‌M.‌Ramesh‌,‌M.‌Howlett‌,‌S.‌Fritzen. (2010).‌The public policy primer: Managing public policy.‌Routledge:‌London‌‌DOI: 10.4324/9780203846454